Tuesday, 14 October 2014

'Old man and the Sea': Hemingway's Tragic Vision of man

How his personal life reflect in ‘Old man and the sea’:

                Many parallels have been drawn between Ernest Hemingway’s life and fiction. Scholars generally agree that Nicks Adams is the character who most closely represents Hemingway the man. There is some dissension, however regarding whether it is in fact Hemingway’s personality or simply his experiences which are being personified by his character. Most of Hemingway’s fiction is based on his own personal experience. When creating the fiction, he invents from this experience. He suffered(injury) at the age eighteen when he served as an ambulance driver for the Italian army, and how and why this episode resurfaces in his literature.
What was his inspiration for ‘old man and the sea’? :

                Gregoria Fuentes, Hemingway’s long time fishing companion and first mate of the pillar, had this to say about his friend’s possible inspiration:
“When we went to sea, we found the old man and the sea. We found him adrift on a little boat with a big fish tied there and when Hemingway went to write he wanted to give it a name and I said why don’t you name it the old man and the sea”.
                If we take Fuentes at his word, then this was Hemingway’s inspiration and the old man he saw that day became a model for the old man in the book. Everything that occurs in the story was likely invented by Hemingway. Writing remains an act of invention. It may initially be based on actual experience, but to make it truly fiction and to define it as such, it must be invented. Hemingway knew and understood that better than anyone. This is one of the many reasons why his work endures.
                Hemingway created an image of himself that was larger than life; literally-people always thought he was taller than his actual height of six feet. His reputation, however, was no accident, and in maintaining Hemingway the myth he alienated many people who had to deal with Hemingway the man. He exaggerated or outright lied about some of his exploits in hunting and war. He had great difficulty to maintaining friendship and marriages. Though he professed not to care for praise, he sought it out and got cranky when it wasn’t given. He could be charming and charismatic or bullying and boorish-often to the same people. And his obsession with manliness-well, let’s just say that the guy bad a few issues with his mom. And though his writing championed those who never gave up, in the end he surrendered in his own battle against depression, ending his life in suicide. But as wrote in ‘old man and the sea’, “man can be destroyed, but never defeated”. More than forty tears after his death, Hemingway’s work lives on his own bibliography and in the countless authors he inspired.
                After his first success in the literary world, Hemingway married and divorced three times. His fourth wife was Mary Welsh. During the 1930s he spent time in Spain and Africa and resided in key West, Florida, where he gained a reputation as a sportsman and athlete. He fought bulls in Spain, haunted in Africa and fished in Florida. The main character of Santiago in old man and the sea was based on someone he encountered during his fishing adventures on the Gulf Stream. While on his boat, he and his friend Carlos Gutierrez encountered a fisherman and a boy being dragged through the sea in a rickety boat, struggling against a big fish. The old man refused any help from Hemingway and his skipper. The story first appeared as an anecdote in an article in Esquire called “on the blue water” in April 1936.
                The tale of the old, courageous fisher man is also said by critics to reflect the author himself. Gary Brenner described Santiago as the aging author Hemingway and the marlin as his noble and beautiful published works. Other recognizes Hemingway’s love of gallantry. Sean O’Faolain is quoted by Carlos Baker as saying that Hemingway trotted the globe “in search of the flame of the spirit in men and beasts”. In old man and the sea, this flame is a characteristic of both Santiago and the marlin.
                ‘Old man and the sea’ was Hemingway’s last published work and he received the Nobel Prize in 1954. Towards the end of his life, he suffered a lot of pain-high blood pressure, enlarged liver and withdrawal. Ultimately, he was unable to endure his pain. Then he was driven to suicide on July 2, 1961.
                Hemingway’s books seem to have a similarity to Hemingway himself. His code heroes may have been previously wounded or gone through some sort of an ordeal, and so they could have a drinking problem, or a problem of sleeping. They seem to be disillusioned, and or self-oriented, and are not usually loyal to a large cause, but rather a small group of people or a relatively small idea or thing.
                Hemingway once said, “As you get older, it is harder to have heroes, but it is sort of necessary”. He knew this because he actually invented his famous code hero. His code hero was a macho man that indulged in liquor, women, and food, and usually did not fear god. While reading ‘old man and the sea’ , the reader is not exposed to the usual Hemingway code hero. He creates an aging hero that proves to be the opposite of the normal code hero by his disinterest in physical pleasure, the presence of religion, and the presence of a companion.
                He also uses the character of old man, marlin as a symbol and also there other many symbols. For example, the marlin represents strength, beauty and the last challenge we all go though. The lions in his dreams resemble youth, freedom and also strength. Santiago, the old man, symbolizes Christ in many ways.
                This book also takes place in the 1940s when Joe DiMaggio played baseball. The old man, a fisherman, lived in Cuba and fishes in the warm gulf waters. Cuba is a perfect setting for the book. During this time period many impoverished people lived in Cuba. Fishing was the primary way to earn a living. Marlins are found mainly in the gulf and it was important for Hemingway to create realistic character that would actually be found in that location. He is also drawing upon his own experiences to make the story more realistic. Despite commonly of being in places in places near the equator this is very harsh place to live.
                Santiago’s battle with the fish produces myriad biblical images and while most obvious are Santiago-as-Christ, other exist as well. An arvin well, for example, provides a Santiago-as-Cain analogy: “Repeatedly, (Santiago) addresses the fish as ‘brother’…..yet, at the same time, he is relentlessly determined to capture and kill the marlin, as Cain killed his brother”. Wells furnishes another provocative analogy by equating the fish as Christ and Santiago as the crucifier. During the battle, Santiago exclaims, “Christ …..I did not know he was so big….I’ll will kill him though….in all his greatness and his glory”. He states, “significantly this is the only places in the story where the expletive, Christ is used and the echo in the (last) sentence is unmistakable…for thine is the power and the glory forever”. John Hamilton further illustrates this point by equating the fish with the Christian acronym, or lchthus (Jesus Christ, son of god, and savior): “it is inconceivable for one as widely read and travelled in fishing and Christian circles as was Hemingway….not to have become familiar with the fish as a god-man symbol”. When Santiago finally kills the fish, he thrusts the harpoon into “the fish’s side just behind the great chest fin”, thus reminding us of Christ’s side being pierced while on the cross.
                 On the level of significance,  Santiago is Harry Morgan alive again and grown old; for what comes to Morgan in a sudden and unexpected revelation as he lies dying is the matrix of the old fisherman’s climatic experience. Since 1937, Hemingway has been increasingly concerned with the relationship between individualism and interdependence; and ‘old man and the sea’ is the culminating expression of this concern in its reflection of Hemingway’s mature view of the tragic irony of man’s fate: that no abstraction can bring man an awareness and understanding of the solidarity and interdependence without which life is impossible; he must learn it, as it has always been truly learned, through the agony of active and isolated individualism in a universe which dooms such individualism. From beginning to end, the theme of solidarity and interdependence pervades the action and provides the structural framework within which the old man’s heroic individualism and his love for his fellow creatures appear and function and which gives them their ultimate significance
                Then there are the qualities which define man’s true place in a world of violence and death indifferent to him, and they are the context which gives the experience of the old fisherman its ultimate significance as the reflection of Hemingway’s culminating concept of the human condition-his tragic vision of man. For in his understanding that “it is enough to live on the sea and kill our true brothers”, the fellow creatures who share life with us and whom he loves, the old man is expressing Hemingway’s conviction that despite the tragic necessity of such a condition, man has a place in the world. And in his realization that in going alone and too far out, “beyond all people in the world”, he has ruined both himself and also the great fish, the old man reflects Hemingway’s feeling that in his individualism and his pride and his need, man inevitably goes beyond his true place in the world and thereby brings violence and destruction on himself and others. Yet in going out too far and alone, Santiago has found his greatest  strength and courage and dignity and nobility and love, and in this he express Hemingway’s view of the ultimate tragic irony of man’s fate: that only through the isolated individualism and the pride which drive him beyond his true place in life does man develop the qualities and the wisdom which teach him the sin of such individualism and pride and which bring him the deepest understanding of himself and of his place in the world. Thus, in accepting his world for what it is and in learning to live in it, Hemingway has achieved a tragic but ennobling vision of man which is in the tradition of Sophocles, Christ, Melville, and Conrad.
                It is not enough, to point out, as P. Weeks does, that”from the first eight words of ‘old man and the sea’ ….we are squarely confronted with a world in which man’s isolation is the most insistent truth”. Truth which is at the same time paradox, for Santiago is profoundly aware that “no man was ever alone on the sea”.  Leo Gurko feels it is –“the culmination of Hemingway’s long search for disengagement from the social world and total entry into the natural”. If the old man leaves the society to go “far out” and “beyond all people in the world”, the consciousness of society and of his relationship to it are never for long out of his thoughts; and in the end, of course, he return to his “good town”, where he finds it pleasant “to have someone to talk to instead of speaking only to himself and to the sea”. To go no further than Santiago’s isolation, therefore or to treat it, as Weeks does, as a theme in opposition to Hemingway’s concern with society is to miss the deepest level of significance both in this novel and in Hemingway’s writing generally.
                Edger Johnson has shown, the true direction of Hemingway’s thought and art from the beginning and especially since 1937 has been a return to society- not in terms of any particular social or political doctrine, but in the broad sense of human solidarity and interdependence. If he began by making “a separate peace” and by going, like Santiago, “far out” beyond society, like the old man, too, he has come back, through Harry Morgan’s “’no man alone’”, Philip Rawlings’s and Robert Jordan’s “no man is an island” , and Santiago’s “no man is ever alone on the sea”  with a deepened insight into its nature and values and a profound awareness of his relationship to it as an individual”.
                In the process, strangely enough- or perhaps it is not strange at all-he has come back from Frederic Henry’s rejection of all abstract values to a reiteration for our time of mankind’s oldest and noblest moral principle. As James B. Colvert points out, Hemingway is a moralist: heir, like his world, to the destruction by science and empiricism of nineteenth-century value assumption, he rejects equally these assumption and the principle underlying them-that intellectual moral abstraction possess independent super sensual existence. Turning from the result nihilism, he goes to experience in the actual world of hostility, violence, and destruction to find in the world which destroyed the old values a basis for new ones-and it is precisely here, Colvert suggests, in reflecting the central moral problem of his world, that Hemingway is significant moralist.
                But out of this concern with action and conduct in a naturalistic universe, Hemingway has not evolved new moral values; rather, he has reaffirmed man’s oldest ones-courage, love, humility, solidarity, and interdependence. It is their basis which is new-a basis not in supernaturalism or abstraction but hard-won through actual experience in a naturalistic universe which is at best indifferent to man and his values. E.M. Halliday observe, that “we are part of a universe offering no assurance beyond the grave, and we are to make what we can of life by a pragmatic ethic spun bravely out of man himself in full and steady cognizance that the end is darkness.”
                Though perfectly realized symbolism and irony, then Hemingway has beautifully and movingly spun out an old fisherman’s great trial just such a pragmatic ethic and its basis in an essentially tragic vision of man; and in this reaffirmation of man’s most cherished values and their reaffirmation in the terms of our time rests the deepest and the enduring significance of ‘old man and the sea’.  
Hemingway –Santiago:

                                 Santiago
                                    Hemingway
Is a perfectionist about all details of fishing
He created his writing with immense care
Has endured a lengthy spell during which he could catch no fish
Had gone a decade without publishing a highly acclaimed novel
Is a no longer regarded by the villages as an undisputed master fisherman
His reputation as a master of his craft had been questioned by some critics
Struggles with effects of aging on his professional abilities
He had recently turned fifty and begun to question whether he was past his prime
Santiago is alone; his wife is dead
He had experienced the death of several people close to him. his mother Grace Hemingway; his former wife and the mother of his children, Pauline phieffer it; and his publisher, Charles Scribner, all died during the year that Hemingway was writing ‘old man and the sea’
                A final comparison between Santiago and Hemingway lies in the fact that they both face “sharks”. For Hemingway, these would be the critics, who, with their bad review, could destroy his achievement.

No comments:

Post a Comment